.

By CAM LUCADOU-WELLS

A PROPOSED three-storey apartment building in one of Dandenong’s most history-laden residential streets has been knocked back by a planning tribunal.
The nine-metre high building at 3 Macpherson Street would tower over the predominantly one and two-storey homes and gardens in an “attractive and intact streetscape”, according to Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal member Geoffrey Rundell.
But it wasn’t concerns for neighbourhood character that caused him to reject a planning permit on 11 March.
The proposal was well within the constraints of a residential growth zone, which allows for four-storey buildings up to 13.5 metres tall and encourages substantial housing change.
“The purposes of the zone deliberately do not refer to respecting or preserving the prevailing neighbourhood character,” Member Rundell said.
“I am satisfied that a three-storey building is appropriate on this site.”
Member Rundell rejected the proposal’s flawed design, which more reflected a concern for “yield” than good amenity.
He agreed with Greater Dandenong Council, which originally rejected the plan, that the proposal didn’t present a “high quality, well-designed facade” to Macpherson Street.
The proposal didn’t have a suitable landscaping plan, the building’s front and side elevations were “unacceptable”, and its south elevation was “imposing and bland form that would detract from the streetscape”, Member Rundell stated..
“Having to screen all rooms facing south is excessive and symptomatic of a poor design response.”
He stated a greater use of setbacks, horizontal louvres and 25 per cent transparent screening could limit views to the south.
“I think better solutions can be found through improved design, including fewer dwellings,” he said.
Red Gum Ward councillor Matthew Kirwan said the case highlighted the need for the council’s Amendment C182, which would put Macpherson Street and a ring of Dandenong streets in a more conservative zone.
“This street, in particular, has a number of historic properties such as ‘The Ranges’,” he said.
VCAT did not consider the amendment because at this stage it wasn’t a “seriously entertained proposal”.
It had yet to be assessed by Planning Panels Victoria and Planning Minister Richard Wynne.
Cr Kirwan estimated there was an “eight-month window” for the developer to re-apply for a permit before the amendment would protect the site.

Comments are closed.

Your first stop before buying a home. View the whole picture.

More News

A Dandenong South business will boost productivity and reduce operating costs, thanks to an energy overhaul. BBS Flooring Products received ...

Dandenong Plaza’s Kmart store is urging shoppers to dig deep for those in need this Christmas. The shop launched ...

George Greig has notched up 40 years with Patterson Cheney. He landed a job with the Dandenong-based automotive company after being ...

Dandenong teen Hosna Deng has been missing since Friday 10 November. Police are appealing for public help to find the 16-year-old. ...

Work has started on what will be Dandenong’s tallest building. On his last day in office, outgoing Greater Dandenong ...

Police are appealing for public help to find Noble Park teenager Vimeanmeas Oun. The 17-year-old has not been seen since ...

Latest Sport

Potential number one draft pick Luke Davies-Uniacke is a rare type of match winner, the type of ball-winning midfielder who ...

TURF 1 & 2 REVIEW – ROUND 4 (DAY ONE) TURF 1 MORDIALLOC v SPRINGVALE SOUTH It may or may not be too early to ...

For star Dandenong Thunder striker Brandon Barnes, it all came down to loyalty in his decision to sign on for ...