DANDENONG STAR JOURNAL
Home » Council setback in ‘slug-gate’ battle

Council setback in ‘slug-gate’ battle

Greater Dandenong Council has stumbled in its latest step to strike out I Cook Foods’ ‘slug-gate’ lawsuit against the council.

On 5 December, the council was refused a subpoena bid in the Victorian Supreme Court to access ICF’s ‘privileged’ legal advice ahead of an appeal hearing.

Victorian Supreme Court judicial registrar Deirdre McCann ruled the council’s application as “impermissible fishing”.

She found Greater Dandenong “failed to describe with precision” how the sought documents would be used on appeal.

“I find also that it is not on the cards, that is, there is no reasonable possibility, that the production documents would assist the defendants.”

A final decision on costs had yet to be made. McCann said her “preliminary view” was to award costs against Greater Dandenong, subject to submissions from the parties.

In August, Supreme Court associate justice Caroline Goulden had dismissed – with costs -the council’s application to throw out ICF and Cook’s lawsuit.

Greater Dandenong is appealing the August decision.

The Dandenong South commercial caterer was shut down by health authorities as part of an investigation into a listeria-infected patient’s death at Knox Private Hospital in 2019.

In its lawsuit, ICF alleges malicious prosecution by the council and two officers Leanne Johnson and Elizabeth Garlick in charging ICF and Cook with 96 food-safety offences that were later withdrawn.

It also alleges public misfeasance against the council and officers in their inspections of ICF and ensuing prosecutions.

Among its claims are that inspector body-cam footage was altered and that a slug was planted in the factory by an inspector.

In its submissions in August, Greater Dandenong had argued that the lawsuit was an abuse of process – after ICF and the council had reached an out-of-court settlement for a previous malicious prosecution claim.

The council was seeking a waiver to accessing ICF’s “privileged” legal advice, claiming that ICF had “tactically” settled to pursue its misfeasance case solely against the State of Victoria.

After that case was concluded last year, ICF launched its new lawsuit against the council soon afterwards.

 

Digital Editions


More News

  • Looking Back

    Looking Back

    100 years ago 4 March 1926 BUSH FIRE DANDENONG POLICE PADDOCKS The Dandenong fire bell was again heard at 5pm last Monday when a fire was reported to have broken…

  • Hope is a practice, not a mood

    Hope is a practice, not a mood

    Judaism has a blessing for everything: for seeing a rainbow, for hearing good news, for waking up, for eating, even for going to the bathroom. Every Friday evening, Jews around…

  • What’s On

    What’s On

    Purchase this photo from Pic Store: 535321 Mordi Fest Non-stop music and roving entertainment over two days. Fun, food, and festivities by the beach. Headlined by Teenage Dads and Joe…

  • Capital Alliance milestone: Triple towers, Little India laneway approved

    Capital Alliance milestone: Triple towers, Little India laneway approved

    A $100 million, triple-tower retail-apartment complex housing a Little India laneway has been approved by the state’s planning department. The permit paves the way for the long-awaited first stage of…

  • Casey school-based sexual offences fall, yet outpace neighbouring LGAs

    Casey school-based sexual offences fall, yet outpace neighbouring LGAs

    Occurrences of sexual offences on Casey school campuses have fallen over the past year; but the municipality’s figures remain well above neighbouring areas. According to data from the Crime Statistics…