.

By Casey Neill

Greater Dandenong Councillors are opposing a bill that doesn’t exist, fearing harm to religion-based charities and schools.
Cr Tim Dark raised a motion about a bill that Victorian Upper House MP Fiona Patten flagged in December, at the Monday 12 February council meeting.
The Reason Party Leader proposed to amend the Charities Act to exclude the advancement of religion as a charitable purpose.
She said that all genuine charitable work should stay tax exempt.
But Ms Patten said commercial enterprises owned by religious institutions should be subject to the same legal and financial laws as other commercial entities.
Cr Dark said the proposal was “a direct attack on religion and will affect all religions in Greater Dandenong”.
He successfully – six votes to four – proposed urgently writing to all state MPs “strongly opposing any changes to the Charities Act 1978”.
Councillors agreed to issue a media release supporting religion, promoting multicultural diversity and opposing any changes.
They’ll also write to all members of the Greater Dandenong Interfaith Network about the council’s support of the advancement of religion in the city.
“When this bill comes out and charities are hit with land tax, pay roll tax…and are forced to cut back on their services…” Cr Dark said.
“This will cause drastic damage to services in the City of Greater Dandenong.
“The council will then have to fill the gaps.”
Cr Jim Memeti said “this community relies heavily on its institutions of worship”.
“To take money away from those organisations I think is unfair,” he said.
Cr Matthew Kirwan opposed the motion because “there’s been no detail of the actual bill that’s been presented to parliament.”
“It might never actually come to parliament,” he said.
“It would be irresponsible to advocate opposing something that we don’t have the details of.”
Cr Sean O’Reilly said the ideas and the notions that Cr Dark put forward in “we would all agree with, as far as supporting religion and so on”.
But he questioned whether councillors knew enough about the topic to form a position.
“If we were diligent we would study what potential changes there would be to those taxes,” he said.
“I don’t think any of us have studied that really. Should we really be making a decision on it?”

Your first stop before buying a home. View the whole picture.

More News

I wanted to be a Greater Dandenong Councillor representative for the Alliance for Gambling Reform because it is an issue ...

 Will Green is transforming a Bangholme block into a thriving farm. The 32-year-old former chef worked in city kitchens ...

 Work to beautify the open space beneath Noble Park’s sky rail has started, but who’ll ...

Churches from across Springvale will come together for the World Day of Prayer. On or near the first Friday in ...

 Little India traders say parking meters are costing them customers. But Greater Dandenong Council says the Foster Street paid ...

 A Dandenong girl helped to send off cyclists on a million-dollar ride for sick kids. Jazmin Makawe-Zaicz was born ...

Latest Sport

Buckley Ridges fell short in the Regional Big Bash final against Mt Clear last Tuesday morning, with the Bucks unable ...

It sure was a cracking, fiery start to the NPL Victoria season, with Dandenong Thunder taking it right up to ...

There is no doubting that the young talent within Dandenong is the envy of the competition. While the Panthers; dressed ...